- by Dr. William Goble, CFSE
- Tuesday, August 04, 2015
- Certification
Getting Realistic Failure Rate Data - Part 6
Over the course of several blogs , I talked about getting realistic failure rate data, where this failure data comes from, and how different methods of failure data analysis compare. I think if you understand this, you will begin to get a very good feel of what it takes…
Read More...
- by Todd Stauffer
- Wednesday, May 22, 2013
- Alarm Management
How do You Compare?
Industry Benchmark Survey on Alarms as Safeguards and Independent Protection Layers (IPLs)
exida recently conducted an industry benchmark survey on the practices for the use of alarms as safeguards and IPLs. With over 200 safety practitioners from around the world providing responses, you can use the survey findings to…
Read More...
- by Steve Gandy, CFSP
- Wednesday, July 02, 2014
- Certification
How Good Is Your Functional Safety Management?
Those operating in the process world should be familiar with the concept of Functional Safety Management (FSM) and the need to have well defined processes and procedures in place. Otherwise, how else will they be able to ensure that their Safety Instrumented System (SIS) and plant…
Read More...
- by Paul Chan, CFSP
- Tuesday, October 13, 2020
- Functional Safety
How the PHA and LOPA are going to affect your SIS
Both Process Safety Analysis (PHA) and Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA) occur in the early stage of the Functional Safety Lifecycle, detailed in both IEC 61511 and IEC 61508. They both serve significant roles in the whole process safety management. Yet, as a facilitator…
Read More...
- by Dr. William Goble, CFSE
- Thursday, February 27, 2020
- Certification
I Failed the CFSE Exam, HELP!
It is tough to receive an email with this message from a prospective CFSE candidate. I know that when I have failed exams, I want to understand what was wrong so I can study those areas of knowledge more deeply and try again. Given the recognition and prestige…
Read More...
- by Steve Gandy, CFSP
- Thursday, September 13, 2018
- Functional Safety
Is It Possible to Extend Proof Test Intervals?
I am often asked whether extending proof test intervals will be a problem.
This is a tricky question. The design and engineering SIL calculations for the Safety Instrumented Functions (SIFs) are taking credit for a specific proof test interval with a defined level of coverage, as defined within the…
Read More...
- by Dr. William Goble, CFSE
- Thursday, May 30, 2013
- Functional Safety
Make IEC 61511 into a Cookbook?
IEC 61508 and IEC 61511 are known as “performance” based standards. Specific design rules, as found in “prescriptive” standards, are not included, allowing for innovation and new technology, as well as creativity and advancement. However, it does imply that a certain level of competency is required.
Others would strongly…
Read More...
- by Steve Gandy, CFSP
- Thursday, November 04, 2021
- Functional Safety
Measuring Performance – Why Are We Not Doing This?
Part of the changes to the IEC61511 standard in 2016, some five (5) years ago now, was to emphasize the need to do a better job with regards to the Operations and Maintenance phase of the safety lifecycle. One of the key aspects of the Operation and Maintenance phase…
Read More...
- by Steve Gandy, CFSP
- Thursday, April 25, 2013
- Certification
Practice Makes Perfect…Almost
How often do Managers see training budgets being cut, or personnel becoming blasé about training in general? Isn’t it the norm that annual performance reviews involve reviewing training requirements? Realistically, how often do these training requirements get ignored and/or forgotten about during the year? The answer, I’m afraid, is…
Read More...
- by Iwan van Beurden, CFSE
- Thursday, June 30, 2016
- Functional Safety
PRODUCT SPOTLIGHT: Practical SIL Target Selection - Risk Analysis per the IEC 61511 Safety Lifecycle
Each month at exida, we strive to spotlight one of our products that makes the job easier for today's industry professional. In this blog, I wanted to talk about the exida publication Practical SIL Target Selection - Risk Analysis per the IEC 61511 Safety Lifecycle which is based on numerous…
Read More...
- by Dr. William Goble, CFSE
- Thursday, November 17, 2016
- Functional Safety
Realistic Failure Rate Data – Necessary
Reliability engineers have known for decades that realistic data must ultimately come from one source, quality field failure data for devices operating in a similar application.
Perhaps that is why IEC 61511:2016, Clause 11.9.3 states
“The reliability data used when quantifying the effect of random failures shall…
Read More...
- by Kate Hildenbrandt
- Wednesday, January 18, 2017
- Software
Reducing Project Lifecycle Cost with exSILentia®
The international functional safety standard IEC 61511 provides the safety lifecycle as a steadfast guideline to assess and mitigate risk for manufacturing processes including refineries, chemical, petrochemical, pulp and paper, and power plants. To achieve a functionally safe system, it is essential to follow each…
Read More...
- by Dr. William Goble, CFSE
- Tuesday, June 23, 2020
- Functional Safety
Risk Management in the News
I just read a great article in the May issue of IEEE Spectrum magazine called “Managing Risk and Responsibility During a Crisis.” The author Robert N. Charette says “If the American people desire the federal government to be their risk manager of first resort, then an open and…
Read More...
- by Steve Gandy, CFSP
- Thursday, January 21, 2016
- Functional Safety
Safety Requirements Specifications (SRS): The Good and the Bad
The IEC 61511 Standard requires the user to create a Safety Requirements Specification (SRS) for a Safety Instrumented System (SIS) that incorporates all the analysis done during the Risk Assessment, HAZOP/PHA and LOPA reviews. The SRS falls into two types: an initial conceptual SRS, often referred to as the…
Read More...
- by Loren Stewart, CFSE
- Thursday, January 31, 2019
- Functional Safety
Setting Goals for 2019: Are You Thinking About Functional Safety?
When I went to set my goals for 2019, I set both personal and professional goals. One of my professional goals is to clean off my desk, but another is to get more people to think about functional safety before an accident occurs, instead of when they are normally…
Read More...
- by John Yozallinas, CFSE
- Thursday, September 24, 2020
- Functional Safety
Share the Wealth (of Functional Safety Knowledge)
Experience is a good teacher. But how do you get the experience?
Formal classroom or online training is often available for more general skills, but on-the-job training usually provides a more in-depth path to gain such experience. After doing a job for a while, working through difficulties with colleagues,…
Read More...
- by Dr. William Goble, CFSE
- Monday, April 11, 2016
- Certification
Site Safety Index™ (SSI) – A Simple Model for Site Variations in Safety
In several of our technical papers over the years, we have noticed that failure rates for the manufacturer, model number are different at different sites, even when the processes were quite similar. When I have mentioned this to end users and manufacturers, often the response is “Yes, I have…
Read More...
- by Steve Gandy, CFSP
- Monday, April 28, 2014
- Software
Still Using Excel to do PFD Calculations?
It’s very interesting to me to find that people are still using excel to do PFD calculations. Whereas this is probably okay for simple single element architectures (i.e. single sensor, single logic solver and single final element), it becomes extremely complicated when dealing with redundant architectures. Moreover, for performing…
Read More...
- by Steve Gandy, CFSP
- Wednesday, February 19, 2014
- Certification
Ten Years Later
It’s hard to believe that the IEC61511 standard has been in existence since 2003, and most companies operating in the process, chemical, and refining industries (or any other hazardous process manufacturer) have adopted its practices. It’s also significant that any plants that were built back then with a…
Read More...